Tax Surge Ahead
An increase in taxes on high-net-worth individuals is on the horizon. Here's how it will impact business and real estate owners beginning January 1, 2025.
How an upcoming income tax increase will impact high-net-worth individuals and business owners.
A new measure to be introduced in 2025 will increase taxes on high-income individuals. With the effective income tax rate set to rise to 22.5 percent or higher, business and real estate owners who plan to realize gains from the sale of real estate or stocks should be aware of the impact on their taxable income after January 1, 2025.
Income tax in Japan consists of aggregate taxation on certain types of income. These include employment income, business income, and real estate income. The total from each type is summed and taxed at progressive rates. The national income tax rate ranges from five to 45 percent (plus 10 percent for local taxes).
Income from the transfer of real estate, and some financial income, is subject to separate taxation. Income from the transfer of real estate (long-term holdings) and stocks is taxed at a flat rate of about 15 percent (plus five percent local tax).
This can give rise to a phenomenon where the portion of total income derived from the transfer of real estate and stocks increases while the actual overall tax rate decreases, thus lowering the effective income tax burden for high-income earners. From the viewpoint of a fair taxation system, the tax burden rate will be raised to 22.5 percent (for the national tax portion), and possibly higher for incomes above a certain level.
How It Works
First, the standard income amount is calculated by totaling the amount of income (both aggregate assessment income and separate income) for which a tax return is filed each March and adding financial income that is not included on the tax return. This includes income where the withholding tax suffered is treated as the final liability, such as dividends from listed stocks, small dividends from unlisted stocks, and income from special accounts.
Special accounts are those which the taxpayer has selected to hold listed stocks. The dividend income, as well as income from the transfer of listed stocks, suffers withholding tax at the source. This is treated as the final liability for these types of income, so they are not included on an income tax return.
Next, the standard income amount is multiplied by 22.5 percent (national tax) after deducting the special deduction (¥330 million). If the total exceeds the regular tax amount, the difference will be levied as additional tax due.
In addition to those who plan to sell real estate or stocks, individuals with high financial income from special accounts will be affected by this amendment.
Even for non-residents of Japan, the tax increase will apply to transfers of real estate located in Japan and transfers of Japan-sourced stocks.
Corporate owners and major investors who plan to sell their companies, individuals who plan to sell their real estate, and high net worth individuals who have large amounts of financial income are advised to understand the impact of this tax increase and consider how to respond.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Disclaimer: Opinions or advice expressed in the The ACCJ Journal are not necessarily those of the ACCJ.
ISA 600 Explained
The International Federation of Accountants has updated the International Standard on Auditing 600 (ISA 600), and the revised standard went into effect on December 15, 2023. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the revisions when it comes to group audits?
What are the pros and cons of the latest update to the International Standard on Auditing?
The International Federation of Accountants has updated the International Standard on Auditing 600 (ISA 600), and the revised standard went into effect on December 15, 2023. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the revisions when it comes to group audits?
Firstly, a group audit refers to an audit of consolidated financial statements where the parent company and its subsidiaries are viewed as a single economic entity or “group.” It is often conducted by the parent company’s auditor, known as the group auditor, and encompasses the financial information of the parent company and its subsidiaries. As the group auditor will provide an opinion on the consolidated financial statements, it is essential that they are satisfied with the work completed by component auditors or local audit teams.
The group audit is necessary because businesses often operate through different legal entities and across different geographical locations. For an accurate view of the group’s financial situation, auditors must assess financial statements at both the parent and subsidiary levels and follow the standards established by the relevant auditing bodies.
International Standard on Auditing 600 (ISA 600) (Revised), Special Considerations—Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors) deals with special considerations that apply to a group audit, including when component auditors are involved. The standard is effective for audits of group financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2023, and aligns with recently revised standards which emphasize the assessment of risk, including ISQM1 and ISA 220 (Revised) and ISA 315 (Revised 2019). There is increased emphasis on the responsibilities of auditors relating to professional skepticism, planning and performing a group audit, two-way communications between the group auditor and component auditors, and documentation.
The changes are intended to:
- Encourage proactive management of quality at the group engagement and the component levels
- Keep the standard fit for purpose in a wide range of circumstances and in a developing environment
- Reinforce the need for robust communication and interactions during the group audit
- Foster an appropriately independent, challenging, and skeptical mindset on the part of the auditor
ISA 600 (Revised) sets out the responsibilities of the group auditor for providing the audit opinion on the group financial statements, including components such as subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, and non-controller entities.
Advantages
Viewed from the component auditor’s side, relying on a variety of useful information regarding management’s rationale from the group auditor can reduce the risk of material misstatement and detection risk when conducting audit components.
One significant change is the introduction of the risk-based approach as a framework for planning and performing a group audit engagement. This means more focus on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement and performing further audit procedures in response to the assessed risks. The group auditor develops initial expectations and, based on these, may involve component auditors in risk assessment procedures, as these individuals may have direct knowledge and experience with the entities or business units that could be helpful in understanding the activities and related risks.
According to the standard, the group engagement partner may take responsibility for directing and supervising component auditors in different ways, such as:
- Discussing identified and assessed risks, issues, findings, and conclusions
- Participating in the closing or other key meetings between the component auditors and component management
The discussion between the group auditors and component auditors provides the opportunity to understand how and where the entity’s financial statements may be susceptible to material misstatement due to fraud. This is done by considering external and internal factors affecting the group that may create an incentive or pressure for group management, component management, or others to commit fraud. The discussion between group engagement partners and other key management team members also provides a chance to identify risks of material misstatement relevant to components where there may be impediments to the exercise of professional skepticism. In other words, the involvement of the group auditor enhances the effectiveness of component auditors.
ISA 600 (Revised) strengthens and clarifies the importance of two-way communications between the group auditor and component auditors as well as various aspects of the group auditor’s interaction with component auditors. However, there are many types of restrictions that may exist, such as on access to people and information (e.g., component management, those charged with governance of component, component auditors) as well as audit documentation.
Viewed from the group auditor’s side, the revised standard provides guidance on ways to overcome restrictions. The group auditor may be able to visit the location of the component auditor or meet with the component auditor to review their audit documentation. They may also be able to review the relevant audit documentation remotely when not prohibited by law or regulation and request that the component auditor prepare and provide a memorandum that addresses the relevant information.
Disadvantages
The application of ISA 600 (Revised) may also bring some downsides.
According to the requirements, the role of group auditor increases, as does the workload of component auditors. The group auditor may involve component auditors to provide information or perform audit work to fulfill the requirements of the standard.
Component auditors can be—and often are—involved in all phases of the group audit. The group auditor shall take responsibility for the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures to be performed, including determining the components at which to perform further audit procedures. This responsibility is demonstrated through meeting the requirements of the consolidation process and considerations when component auditors are involved.
Communication
ISA 600 (Revised) includes enhanced documentation requirements and application material to emphasize the link to the requirements of ISA 230 and other relevant ISAs. The required documentation includes:
Basis for the group auditor’s determination of components
Basis for the group auditor’s determination of the competence and capabilities of component auditors
Documentation of the direction and supervision of component auditors and the review of the work
Additional considerations when access to audit documentation is restricted
The strength and clarity of the importance of two-way communications between the group auditor and component auditors in the standard are likely to result in more work for the group engagement team. This is particularly true regarding the enhanced responsibilities in evaluating the component auditor’s communication and the adequacy of their work, the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained, and communicating with group management and those charged with governance of the group. References in the standard to the definition of “engagement team” includes the group auditor and component auditors.
As mentioned, the group auditor will involve component auditors and clarify the instructions for the risk-assessment procedures. However, in practice, there are some instructions from the group auditor that may not be suitable for component auditors, and this can lead to some aspects of the instructions not being effective.
These changes to the standard will take time to implement, comply with, and complete for both the group auditor component auditor sides.
Generally, both sides should make sure that they understand the new requirements and that audit methodologies are updated accordingly and in a timely manner. They should also reassess the models being used for considering component materiality and aggregation risk to determine whether they are still appropriate.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Internal Controls, Sustainability, and IFRS
With two new sustainability standards in effect for annual reporting as of January 1, 2024, companies may need to reassess their internal controls to ensure they are compliant with disclosure requirements.
How two new sustainability standards impact reporting and disclosure, and what companies should consider to ensure they are compliant.
On June 26, 2023, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) unveiled its first-ever standards for sustainability disclosure. Designated International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) S1 and S2, they focus on general sustainability- and climate-related disclosures.
As demand grows from investors, regulators, customers, and other stakeholders for companies to disclose their sustainability practices and impact on the environment and society, these standards could help with the assessment of a company’s long-term sustainability, its ability to manage risks and opportunities, and to compare companies across industries.
IFRS S1, General Requirements for Disclosures of Sustainability-related Financial Information, requires companies to disclose financial information about their sustainability-related risks and opportunities that is useful to primary users of general-purpose financial reports in making decisions related to providing resources to the company. IFRS S2, Climate-related Disclosures, requires companies to disclose the same related to climate.
As this information could affect the company’s cash flow, access to financing, or cost of capital, the requirement for reporting and transparency might influence strategy, objectives, and decision-making processes.
With these new sustainability standards taking effect for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024, companies should reassess their systems of internal controls to comply with the disclosure requirements.
The table below shows internal controls that companies may need to consider.
| Internal Control Areas | Points to Consider |
|---|---|
| Data collection, verification, and management | · Accuracy and reliability of sustainability data for reporting · Manage the increased volume of sustainability data |
| Risk assessment and management | · Controls and processes to identify, assess, and manage risks and opportunities · Consistency with its strategic decisions and operations |
| Technology infrastructure | · Invest in new technology and IT controls |
| Training and awareness | · Invest in employee training and awareness programs · Policies and procedures to evaluate competencies |
| Governance | · Establish authority and responsibility |
| Integration with financial reporting | · Communication and monitoring from management and those charged with governance · Facilitate external audit |
| Stakeholder engagement | · Inclusion of processes for engaging with stakeholders |
Data Collection, Verification, and Management
The IFRS standards and reporting promote transparency and accountability regarding sustainability- and climate-related risks and opportunities. By requiring the collection and validation of data, a company can ensure accuracy and reliability for reporting.
Doing so will require robust internal controls similar to those used in financial reporting, and internal controls may need to be updated to manage the storage, access, and protection of a larger volume of data. As sustainability reporting is often required by regulatory bodies or industry standards, integrating sustainability metrics into internal controls helps ensure compliance and reduces the risk of penalties and legal issues.
Risk Assessment and Management
As sustainability reporting involves identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and monitoring risks and opportunities related to sustainability and climate, internal controls must include processes to effectively assess, manage, and mitigate risks. It is also key to ensure that those charged with governance have considered trade-offs associated with the risks and opportunities.
Sustainability reporting also highlights long-term sustainability goals and opportunities. Therefore, aligning internal controls with these goals can ensure that strategic decisions and operations are consistent with sustainability objectives.
Technology Infrastructure
Companies may need to invest in new technology and IT controls to manage sustainability data, especially if they are transitioning to digital reporting platforms. Information systems should be able to capture internal and external sources of data related to sustainability and climate risks and opportunities.
Training and Awareness
Companies may need to invest in employee training and awareness programs to ensure that all personnel understand the sustainability goals and the importance of reporting, and can carry out their internal control responsibilities. Companies may need to monitor the contributions of employees to these objectives. Processes may include policies to determine whether appropriate skills and competencies are available or will be developed to oversee strategies designed to respond to risks and opportunities related to sustainability and climate.
Governance
Sustainability reporting may necessitate changes in corporate governance to ensure that sustainability considerations are integrated into strategy and decision-making processes. Internal controls should reflect shifts in governance by having a governance body (which may include a board, committee, or equivalent) or individuals responsible for oversight of risks and opportunities related to sustainability and climate. Companies should also consider updating policies and procedures to reflect the responsibilities of those charged with governance and management.
Integration with Financial Reporting
Aligning the processes for sustainability and financial reporting requires careful coordination and internal controls to ensure that both are accurate and consistent. Policies and processes should consider how, and how often, those charged with governance and management are informed about sustainability- and climate-related risks and opportunities and decisions on significant transactions. Companies may also need to establish controls and policies to facilitate external audits of their sustainability disclosures to ensure that the data, processes, metrics, and targets adhere to reporting standards.
Stakeholder Engagement
Internal controls may need adjusting to address the broader set of stakeholders associated with sustainability reporting compared with traditional financial reporting. Sustainability reporting can lead to increased stakeholder scrutiny and engagement, and effective internal controls can help manage these interactions and ensure that stakeholder concerns are addressed, and the company’s reputation maintained. Communication methods should take into considering the timing, audience, and nature of the engagement.
As the ISSB is currently developing these sustainability standards, we expect that additional standards might be promulgated to address the needs of the stakeholders. Regular reviews and updates of internal controls, policies, and procedures are necessary to adapt to changing sustainability reporting standards and evolving practices.
Companies focusing on sustainability could drive innovations and efficiencies in their processes that lead to cost reductions. Internal controls can monitor and optimize these changes to ensure that they are implemented effectively and align with the company’s strategies, objectives, and decision-making processes.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
2023 Tax Reform Proposals
On December 16, 2022, the Government of Japan released its 2023 tax reform proposals. The amendments contain changes to the rules related to gifts and inheritance tax. The proposals are usually promulgated into law by the end of March and enter into force on April 1. Here is an overview of what to expect.
How changes to gift tax rules and audits may impact you
On December 16, 2022, the Government of Japan released its 2023 tax reform proposals. The amendments contain changes to the rules related to gifts and inheritance tax. The proposals have been promulgated into law and entered into force on April 1. Here is an overview of the changes.
Seven Year Lookback for Gifts
Currently, gifts bestowed within three years of the giver’s death are added back to the estate of the deceased for Japan inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. The value of the assets is reduced by any gift tax paid at the time the gift was received, and this amount is then subject to IHT along with the other assets of the deceased.
To offset this, one aspect of long-term estate planning is to make small annual gifts which are taxed at gift-tax rates lower than the effective IHT rate that would be levied if the gifts had remained part of the estate.
The reforms increased the lookback period to seven years for gifts made on or after January 1, 2024. This brings Japan in line with countries such as the United Kingdom.
Unlike the UK, however, there is no gradual reduction in the value of the gift over the seven-year period. One hundred percent of the gift’s value is added back to the taxable estate, regardless of whether it was made seven years or one day prior to death. A ¥1 million deduction is allowed for gifts made between three and seven years prior to someone’s passing.
The chart below shows this in action:
This change has a significant impact on lifetime estate planning, as gifts made on or after January 1, 2024, will be subject to a seven-year lookback for inheritance tax purposes.
For expats, discussion about Japan IHT planning with overseas parents can be difficult—especially if being subject to the Japanese rules would impact overseas planning. However, these proposed changes will accelerate the need for gift planning during 2023.
Valuation Methods for High-Rise Apartments
Although there are no specific amendments, another issue that needs to be considered in the near future is the government’s discussion of amending the rules surrounding the IHT valuation of apartments in high-rises.
Currently, there can be a large disparity between the fair market value of an apartment and its tax basis for IHT purposes. This is due to the use of various tax valuations that reduce the IHT value. For apartments in certain parts of Tokyo, the IHT value can be significantly lower than the fair market value. This disparity can be used to reduce the value of an estate considerably for IHT purposes. The government has indicated that it will look to close this avenue for tax planning in the future.
Tax Audit Statistics
The government also released its tax audit statistics in December, covering audits conducted between July 2021 and June 2022. Direct comparisons to previous years are unreliable due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the tax authority’s ability to conduct audits. However, the number of audits involving overseas assets increased by 20 percent over the previous year and is approaching the level seen prior to the pandemic. About two-thirds of the cases involved undisclosed assets in North America or Asia.
Additionally, the number of simple inquiries where the tax office contacts a taxpayer by post or phone increased by eight percent over the previous year and is 40 percent higher than pre-pandemic levels. This indicates that the tax office has shifted to less formal inquiries as a means of identifying taxpayers who require a full audit.
Summary
The increase in the lookback period for gifts accelerates the need for planning before the end of the year. This will be necessary to ensure that gifts fall out of the scope of IHT sooner. Current planning utilizing high-rise apartments may also need to be revisited in light of the anticipated changes.
As always, with any informal contact from the tax office, it is wise to consult with your tax advisor before submitting a response.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Supply Chain Woes
Nowadays, it is common to hear and to read in the news that the world is experiencing unprecedented supply chain woes. China lacks coal and paper. The United States has a shortage of toilet paper and toys. And India is low on microchips. Why is this happening? Here are four current issues that negatively impact the world’s supply chains.
Four causes of worldwide shortages and how to address them
Photo: Photo by Tom Fisk from Pexels
Nowadays, it is common to hear and to read in the news that the world is experiencing unprecedented supply chain woes. China lacks coal and paper. The United States has a shortage of toilet paper and toys. And India is low on microchips. Even we, the masses, have experienced delivery delays and found that certain items, previously one click away, are out of stock. Why is this happening? Below are four current issues that negatively impact the world’s supply chains.
1. Lockdowns (Still) in the World’s Factory: China
Economists say that companies with an overreliance on factories in China are the most vulnerable in this supply chain crisis. But this describes most companies. Back in the early 2000s, when an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, forced China to temporarily shut its manufacturing capacity to control the virus, the country had just the sixth-largest economy in the world, with a nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of $1.4 trillion. Fewer than 20 years later, China’s economy had grown to be the world’s second largest, with a nominal GDP of $14.72 trillion in 2020.
China has also become the producer of 28.7 percent of all the world’s goods, and exports $2.6 trillion of worth of products annually. This makes it the top exporting economy. Coupled with its number-two ranking for imports, it’s no wonder China has garnered the moniker “the world’s factory.”
How did China achieve such a rise? By making itself a manufacturing powerhouse and primary recipient of foreign investments thanks to a large, cheap, but capable labor force and low tax rates. With these manufacturing credentials under its belt, and huge amounts of trade coming in and out, China became a key player on the world stage.
More than two years into the coronavirus pandemic, as vaccines were being rolled out and populations inoculated around the globe, Covid-19 became a norm in our daily lives. We all thought that lockdowns were a thing of the past. But China has continued to implement a zero-Covid strategy, loosening its grip on the population only as 2022 draws to a close under growing pressure from weary citizens.
China’s zero-Covid policy required strict quarantine, even if just a handful of cases are reported. As a result, tens of millions of people in at least 30 regions of China have been ordered to stay at home under partial or full lockdowns. How changes will affect the severity and impact of countermeasures remains to be seen. Until now, these lockdowns have caused massive disruptions to China’s manufacturing activities that have translated into worldwide supply chain interruptions.
2. Worldwide port congestions and bottlenecks
As we all get back to our normal lives and try to move on from the bad memories of the pandemic, economic activity has restarted and demand for various goods are returning to pre-pandemic levels. This hefty appetite from various economies—on top of the prevailing delivery backlogs and shortages caused by the pandemic—has put massive strain on the world’s ports. The situation has been exacerbated by various businesses trying to pile up their respective stocks in the face of supply uncertainties.
Ninety percent of global trade is transported via sea. Delays caused by port congestion have driven up the cost of many goods or, in the worst cases, caused depleted stock of some much-needed items. For example, the United States, the world’s largest importer and second-largest exporter, has seen its ports experience unprecedented cargo ship backlogs. Billions of dollars’ worth of goods are stranded off the coasts of the United States as there’s neither enough manpower nor resources to unload them. Ultimately, this causes delays in delivery to end users. The same thing is happening at major ports around the world.
This existing issue has caused cargo prices, as well as average port-to-port waiting times, to multiply to record levels.
3. Power levels: on red alert
As businesses around the world struggle to address the ongoing logistical and manufacturing disruptions caused by the pandemic and existing production backlogs, another problem has arisen: Where to source power?
It is a given that power is necessary to fuel manufacturing capacity around the world and keep goods in production, but meeting demand means overcoming challenges.
In the Pacific, China last summer experienced its worst heatwave and drought in six decades, and its power source portfolio suffered. Hydroelectricity, the country’s second-largest source of power, yielded an all-time low output due to the much lower water levels at hydroelectric plants. To conserve electricity, the government took steps such as ordering the closure of factories, demanding that air conditioners be set to above 26 degrees Celsius, or shutting down elevators for the first three floors in some provinces. The regions affected are key manufacturing centers for semiconductors, solar panels, and batteries, and the reduced production affected some of the world’s largest electronics companies.
Europe has been on red alert since March as economic sanctions imposed on Russia for its war in Ukraine, measures which include the cessation of gas imports from Russia, have diminished energy supplies. Russian gas normally accounts for about 40 percent of European Union (EU) fuel imports. As winter starts, the EU is bracing for two scenarios—one in which a few member states experience power cuts and another in which blackouts occur in many member states at the same time. Can you imagine the famous Eiffel Tower on a lights-off schedule? The EU is also the location of some of the world’s biggest manufacturing brands, hence this development will mean further disruptions to the global supply chain.
4. Russia’s economic embargo, Part II
As the West and its allies impose costly economic sanctions on Russia to cripple its economy and ability to fund its military operations in Ukraine, they have also cut themselves off from what Russia contributes to the supply chain. Aside from oil and petroleum products, industry relies on the country for metals, including nickel, palladium, platinum, rhodium, aluminum, and copper. These minerals are key components in the production of automobiles, semiconductors, aerospace components, packaging, renewable energy, and other industrial products.
Russia also specializes in chemical production, particularly of the potassium compound potash and ammonia, key ingredients in fertilizers. This area may be impacted most as Russia accounts for roughly 10 percent of ammonia and five percent of urea production globally, as well as 20–25 percent of global ammonia exports. The country is also a significant producer and exporter of potash, delivering about 18 percent of the world’s supply in 2021. Low or no supply from Russia, combined with the existing issue of high energy prices, is likely to result in significant disruption to the supply of fertilizers for the foreseeable future.
It is very evident that manufacturing companies were caught flat-footed as these developments were thrust upon us and found to be overly reliant on certain countries to produce their products. Many have preferred suppliers for materials and labor located in countries where conditions have impacted manufacturing. As these supply chain woes were often not considered in corporate contingency plans, it is normal to execute short-term reactive solutions, such as stockpiling supplies and chartering private container ships. But companies know that these are just temporary fixes and recognize the need for permanent solutions.
Recently, we began to see companies start to implement long-term strategies to “de-risk” their supply chains. Steps may include finding new and more diverse sources of raw materials, widening the list of suppliers, and setting up independent factories in multiple parts of the world to cater to demand in specific regions, diversify operations, and minimize risk.
Even though these long-term action plans will further exhaust significant resources, it is indeed worth the investment for a company to secure its operations and, most importantly, to ensure an uninterrupted supply chain to meet consumers’ unending demand for goods.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Trusts and Audits
In December 2021, the Japanese government revealed its proposed changes to tax legislation. Some of these proposals affecting individual taxpayers are discussed in this column, together with an update on how Covid-19 has impacted the tax authority’s approach to inheritance and gift tax audits.
How changes to Japan’s tax rules may impact individuals
Listen to this story:
In December 2021, the Japanese government revealed its proposed changes to tax legislation. Some of these proposals affecting individual taxpayers are discussed in this column, together with an update on how Covid-19 has impacted the tax authority’s approach to inheritance and gift tax audits.
Assets and Liabilities Statement
The rules surrounding this reporting obligation, which was introduced in 2015, have been amended to increase the scope of taxpayers subject to the requirements.
The additions are aimed at minority shareholders of large family corporations, such as an owner’s Japan-resident spouse or children. If the shareholder receives dividends and has no other source of income, the income tax can be settled through withholding and no return is due. Previously, they would not have met the requirement to file an assets and liabilities statement, regardless of the value of their shareholding and other assets, but the proposed changes would bring them within the scope of the report.
The changes are due to apply to income and assets beginning January 1, 2023 (January 1, 2024, for mitigating factors) with the first reports due in 2024.
Trust Reporting Requirements
Another proposed amendment is to the trust reporting requirements that apply to Japan-resident trustees and trust corporations of domestic and overseas trusts. Previously, if it was difficult to estimate the value of the assets within a trust, then the assets did not need to be included in the filing. The reports are required within one month of:
- Establishment or closure of a trust
- Changes in beneficiaries
- Changes in beneficial rights
Although there are no penalties for failure to file, individual trustees should pay attention to any filing requirements triggered by this amendment, which will apply to reports due beginning January 1, 2023.
Audit Focus
In December 2021, the National Tax Authority (NTA) released its annual audit statistics for 2020, showing the impact of Covid-19 on its approach to onsite audits. During 2020, the number of inheritance tax audits fell by 52 percent, from 10,635 to just 5,106. Of these, 551 related to overseas assets, with the NTA utilizing tax treaty information exchange provisions and Common Reporting Standards information to gather details of the assets. The average tax raised was ¥9.4 million per audit opened, a 47-percent increase in the average compared with the previous year’s ¥6.4 million.
The decrease in audits was countered by a 58-percent increase in the number of simple investigations, consisting of telephone inquiries and correspondence with taxpayers. There were 13,634 such instances in 2020, compared with 8,632 in 2019, while ¥650 million in additional tax and penalties were levied. The move from onsite audits to simple investigations shows that the pandemic has caused the NTA to focus personnel on audits with a higher chance of levying tax. The remainder are being handled with remote inquiries, seemingly a more efficient use of resources.
Takeaways
The tax reform proposals will affect individual taxpayers in different ways but, for most, the change to the filing deadline will reduce the administrative burden of filing asset and liabilities statements and overseas assets reports. Trustees of overseas trusts will have to pay attention to the changes in reporting requirements and be prepared to file reports containing estimated valuations. Finally, the increase in simple investigations is likely to mean that more taxpayers receive calls from their local tax office. In such cases, as always, seek professional advice on how to respond to such requests.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Added Disclosures
The journal entries used to record the transactions of a typical trading company seem basic and are usually taught in introductory accounting classes. But while simple, when coupled with financial management concepts such as reverse factoring, supply chain finance, or supplier finance arrangement, these entries may require additional disclosures for financial reporting purposes. In November, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed additional disclosure requirements to enhance the transparency of supplier finance arrangements.
Proposed reporting rules eye supplier finance arrangements
The journal entries used to record the transactions of a typical trading company seem basic and are usually taught in introductory accounting classes. But while simple, when coupled with financial management concepts such as reverse factoring, supply chain finance, or supplier finance arrangement, these entries may require additional disclosures for financial reporting purposes. In November, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed additional disclosure requirements to enhance the transparency of supplier finance arrangements.
The Transaction
A trading company generally purchases on account from its suppliers, and is invoiced after the receipt of goods. This poses no issues if the company is in good financial condition, but it can be a challenge if the company has liquidity concerns. When a company cannot pay the invoiced amount, as a rule the supplier will decline further transactions with the company or will impose stringent credit measures. This may disrupt the company’s supply chain. To avoid this and secure the supply chain, the company may enter into a supplier finance arrangement with a financial institution.
Under such an arrangement, the financial institution pays the supplier at a discounted rate and the company later reimburses the financial institution. This may sound like factoring, but it differs in that factoring is normally initiated by the supplier, who sells its accounts receivable. Here, reverse factoring is initiated by the buyer obtaining a loan to defray payables.
A supplier finance arrangement is beneficial for both supplier and buyer. The former is assured of payment and can collect the amount due earlier than the due date of the invoice, while the buyer benefits from an extended due date.
Accounting Concerns
But there are things to consider. On the supplier’s side, such an arrangement is like selling accounts receivable to a financial institution, only it is buyer initiated. In other words, like a factoring of receivables, this can be viewed as off-balance-sheet financing that allows a company to increase its cash without reporting a corresponding increase in liability or equity.
On the buyer’s side, a supplier finance arrangement adds another layer to the purchase-to-pay cycle. Instead of the usual buy and pay, it becomes buy, loan, and pay. The issue here is whether accounts payable must be converted into loans payable and disclosed in financial statements.
International Financial Reporting Standards 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (IFRS 7) requires an entity to disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period.
International Accounting Standards 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) requires companies to distinguish financing from working capital purposes.
A company that is protecting its current ratio would like the payable, arising from the supplier finance arrangement, to be classified as loans payable instead of trades payable. This is because loans payable can be reported as non-current when they are to be settled more than 12 months after the reporting period. This cannot be done for trades payable, which are always reported as current liabilities even if they are due to be settled more than 12 months after the reporting period. Thus, a disclosure requirement for supplier finance arrangements is necessary to understand the transaction and standardize the financial reporting requirements.
As IASB Chair Andreas Barckow explained: “Investors require more detailed disclosures about companies’ supply chain finance arrangements, as these funding practices are becoming increasingly common. The proposed requirements are designed to give investors the information they need to assess the effects of such finance arrangements on a company’s liabilities and cash flows.”
Proposed Solution
The IASB plans to amend IFRS 7 and IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows, to require buyer companies to disclose information that enables investors to assess the effects of a company’s supplier finance arrangements on its liabilities and cash flows.
The proposed rule requires an entity to disclose, at the beginning and end of the reporting period, the line items in the statement of financial position in which the entity presents financial liabilities that are part of a supplier finance arrangement.
The proposed financial reporting requirements for supplier finance arrangements are still on the IASB’s exposure draft and are open for comment until March 28, 2022.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
CPA and 4IR
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is bringing great opportunities and challenges to many business sectors, including accounting and auditing. This requires employees to be more knowledgeable about their area of expertise and proficient in languages, as well as to develop soft skills. Here are some key things that certified public accountants (CPAs) need to know to thrive in the years to come.
What accountants need to know to thrive during the Fourth Industrial Revolution
The term Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) was first used in English in 2016 by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, inspired by the German “Industrie 4.0,” coined in 2011 at Hannover Messe by Professor Wolfgang Wahlster, director and CEO of the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (AI). In his book of the same name, Schwab describes how the 4IR is being ushered in by shifts and trends. These include AI, Big Data, the Internet of Things, blockchain, and machine learning—all of which allow us to automate and gain greater insight from many traditional processes.
The 4IR is bringing great opportunities and challenges to many business sectors, including accounting and auditing. This requires employees to be more knowledgeable about their area of expertise and proficient in languages, as well as to develop soft skills. Here are some key things that certified public accountants (CPAs) need to know to thrive in the years to come.
How is 4IR changing accounting and auditing?
Instead of manually dealing with traditional bookkeeping and auditing tasks, CPAs are learning to use new software and technologies. The benefits are numerous and could improve relationships with clients by:
- Reducing repetitive tasks, leaving more time for other work and interaction with clients
- Allowing files to be accessed, edited, and controlled from anywhere via cloud-based systems
- Providing greater ease, speed, and accuracy when managing client data
- Greatly enhancing security and compliance
- Equipping CPAs to answer client questions, provide feedback, or give advice instantly
- Bringing greater transparency to a client’s financial insights
How might the professions change?
Accountants may leave bookkeeping and stewardship to become strategic business partners. As automation increases, CPAs will need the ability to analyze, interpret, and use the output generated by these technologies to make strategic and operational decisions.
Auditors won’t be left behind in the 4IR. Instead, technology will not only assist in improving the quality of audit performance and data analysis, but also in giving clients better value-added feedback and superior recommendations.
How can CPAs adapt to the change?
1. Keep learning
Rapid changes in accounting and auditing practices, as well as in technology, require that individuals continuously learn. As a result, they can achieve their career goals, contribute to the organization, and provide value to clients.
As an international auditing firm, Grant Thornton is taking the lead in utilizing new technology to enhance audit quality and efficiency. Grant Thornton also annually provides training programs to help employees update their knowledge of tax regulations, financial reporting standards, auditing best practices, relevant laws and regulations, and technology.
In my opinion, the 4IR will bring more opportunities for accountants and auditors with international qualifications. Certificates such as those from the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, CPA Australia, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants allow accountants and auditors to maximize their abilities and improve the competitiveness of human resources in the field of accounting and auditing.
2. Think radically
As professionals, we need to be open to profound changes. Research shows that humans and computers working together produce better results than computers alone. Moreover, we need to think about how we are going to take advantage of technology to maximize traits such as skepticism, leadership, teamwork, personal relations, and creativity that are beneficial to auditing and accounting careers.
3. Be adaptable
To remain relevant in an ever-evolving digital world, we must embrace these changes. Therefore, adaptability and agility are considered the most important soft skills for accountants and auditors. These skills play a vital role in ensuring that accountants and auditors can adapt to a changing working environment and to the challenges emerging from evolving business models.
To become a future-proof professional, we need to be flexible and embrace innovation.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Be on Time
How often do we hear people say, “Sorry for being late”? How about, “I’m sorry I’m late, the traffic was so bad”? Does this sound like us? Many studies have shown why some people just can’t get somewhere on time. Several causes have been identified, but there is one common trait running through the behavior of chronically late individuals that may be the universal reason for their perpetual tardiness. Do we need to be on time for our appointments and meetings? Have we given thought to why punctuality is important?
Why punctuality matters and how to ensure it
How often do we hear people say, “Sorry for being late”? How about, “I’m sorry I’m late, the traffic was so bad”? Does this sound like us? Many studies have shown why some people just can’t get somewhere on time. Several causes have been identified, but there is one common trait running through the behavior of chronically late individuals that may be the universal reason for their perpetual tardiness.
Do we need to be on time for our appointments and meetings? Have we given thought to why punctuality is important?
Nick Saban, head football coach of the University of Alabama Crimson Tide, is renowned for teaching teamwork and responsibility. He says, “Be on time because it shows we care.” His teams’ success demonstrates why it matters.
Being on time shows others that we:
- Respect their time
- Are reliable and trustworthy
When we are punctual, we show others that we respect them and are thinking not only of ourselves but also their lives, roles, and responsibilities. We’re actively considering how our actions will affect them.
Arriving on schedule should not be a one-time event. To set a strong foundation of trust—and to make the most of our personal and professional relationships—we should always arrive on time.
As a secondee to the Tokyo office of Grant Thornton Japan for more than a year—and having worked for more than six years as an audit manager handling many Japanese clients in Indonesia—I am well aware of how important punctuality is in Japan. These days, more Japanese people have become relaxed about this, but being on time remains important in Japanese society, where shinrai (trust) is key.
How to Be Punctual
Here are three ways to break a pattern of tardiness:
1. Set alarms
This might not be an easy thing to do if we are not organized, but the more we use alarms to get things done—and stick to the process—the more reliable this approach will become.
2. Write it down
Some of us need to physically record things to remember them. Note conversations and plans on your smartphone calendar and stick to them.
3. Anticipate delays
Think ahead and plan for the unexpected:
- Check the traffic and weather before leaving
- Make sure you have enough gas the night before
- Ensure that your commuter pass has adequate fare
- Have breakfast at home instead of along the way
- Leave earlier to avoid crowded roads or trains
- Always have a Plan B
- For online meetings, make sure that you are in front of the computer at least 10 minutes early
Sometimes, delays are unavoidable. What should you do when you are late?
1. Apologize
The first and most crucial thing to do is to apologize to your boss and colleagues. When we can’t arrive on time, someone else may have to cover our work. Our absence might have caused a huge problem for our colleagues, therefore the most important thing is to show them respect and apologize.
2. Explain
It is considered good manners in Japan to explain why we are late for work. But we need to be careful of what reason we give and avoid those which are too personal.
3. Update
While still in transit, it is important to state exactly what time we expect to arrive, as this will affect the efficiency of the workplace. Giving our superiors enough information is also a way to show our sincerity and that we care about the work. Upon arrival at the office, we should apologize directly to our superiors and again explain the reason for our tardiness. It is also advisable to apologize once again prior to leaving to show that we care about having inconvenienced others. By doing so, we can leave a good impression and build a better relationship with our superiors.
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en
Covid-related Financial Relief
As relief from economic and financial distress caused by the coronavirus pandemic, you may have received subsidies or grants from the national and/or local government. You may be wondering if you must declare this assistance on your income tax return. Here is a summary of tax treatment and revenue recognition timing published by the National Tax Agency of Japan.
What tax liabilities come with coronavirus help?
As relief from economic and financial distress caused by the coronavirus pandemic, you may have received subsidies or grants from the national and/or local government. You may be wondering if you must declare this assistance on your income tax return. Here is a summary of tax treatment and revenue recognition timing published by the National Tax Agency of Japan.
Non-Taxable
Payments received from the support fund set up in response to the new coronavirus (article 7 of the temporary special provisions of employment insurance)
Funds received from the allowance set up to support leave taken in response to the new coronavirus (article 7 of the temporary special provisions of the employment insurance law)
Special Fixed Amount Cash Payout (tentative name) of ¥100,000 per household member (article 4, paragraph 1 of the special measures concerning taxation regarding the coronavirus)
Special Cash Payout for Families with Children in Year 2020 (article 4, paragraph 2 of the act regarding coronavirus-related special taxation measures)
Emergency handouts to help support students (Article 9, Paragraph 1, Item 15 of the Income Tax Act
Temporary Special Cash Payout for Low Income, Single-Parent Households (Article 9, Paragraph 1, Item 17 of the Income Tax Act)
Provider Relief Fund related to the coronavirus (Article 9, Paragraph 1, Item 17 of the Income Tax Act)
Discount coupons provided as Support for Users of Company-Sponsored Babysitters (Article 9, Paragraph 1, Item 17 of the Income Tax Act)
Subsidy under the Babysitter Support Project of Tokyo (Article 9, Paragraph 1, Item 17 of the Income Tax Act)
Taxable
Treated as business revenue. Based on:
Payment decisions
- Covid-19 subsidies (for those who are self-employed and sole proprietors)
- Tokyo Metropolis Infection Spread Prevention Support Fund
Payment decision or expense incurment regarding:
- Employment adjustment subsidies
- Elementary school closure support
- Rent support
- Sustaining subsidies for small businesses
- Business continuity subsidies for agriculture, forestry, and fishing enterprises
- Subsidies for medical institutions and pharmacies helping to prevent coronavirus spread
Expenses incurred in connection with:
- Relief provided under the coronavirus-related supplementary aid to offset interest payments
Treated as Occasional Income
Occasional income (revenue–expenses, maximum ¥500,000 special deduction). Based on revenue recognition timing.
Covid-19 subsidies (for employment income earners)
- Payment decision
Go To Travel Campaign
- At end of travel or on use of coupon tickets
Go To Eat Campaign
- On use of meal tickets
Go To Event Campaign
- On use of event tickets
Treated as Miscellaneous Income
Based on revenue recognition timing.
Covid-19 subsidy (for miscellaneous income earners)
- Payment decision
For more information, please contact Grant Thornton Japan at info@jp.gt.com or visit www.grantthornton.jp/en